Liquid Change

August 29, 2007

Personal Preference Vs. Branding

Filed under: Uncategorized — liquid06 @ 1:10 pm
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

To make a long background story short and necessarily vague:

As of yesterday I have a project that needs to be completed within the next two days. This project is the first of its kind and also one of the first impressions new hires or potential hires are going to get with our company. I have not seen any content for this project (I don’t know what the powers-that-be have decided should be included), and I don’t have any specific ideas with regard to artwork because many of the basic points of marketing communications have simply been missed in the rush to have this publication printed. There are fundamental problems with designing on a tight deadline in a situation like this. Almost no one in our company has any concept of what it means to have integrated marketing communications within their department, or within the company as a whole. In our case, the process should probably be a slow, teaching stance to educate others in the company about the scope of print and web design work along with the basic philosophies of marketing and branding. For all I know, I may be one of only a handful of people in our company (8,000 employees) who feel confident using InDesign.

I explained in an e-mail that there are a lot of things to take into account when it comes to branding something. If there is no existing brand identity, creating one can help users identify the department. Also, in our case, it will also tint people’s first impressions and lasting perceptions of our company as a whole. I talked about how important it was to make sure that all the communications with users carried a consistent look, feel and overall message. Even if no logo is created, the graphic elements and styles should be the same across communications.

With the tight deadline in mind, I asked whether or not any current ‘look’ existed for the department. We haven’t developed guidelines for the rest of the company to have access to (yet), so this department couldn’t really know the company style. I asked about colors, themes and the message this project is supposed to convey.

The response I got used words like “I like” and “would be nice.”

I know, I know. It’s just because no one else in the company is educated about the process of branding anything or creating a publication. But it still makes me angry to see one person’s preference (with no knowledge or more than a minute’s thought) projected on an entire department (and on the perceptions of the company’s new hires), but that’s exactly what will happen. Why? Because the assignment is due in two days and we don’t have a team of people to give it time and thought.

I’m no professional – I have no formal training in this field outside of some marketing classes, but I have read enough on the internet to know that perception is important! I’m nearly sure that “how the people who see this think of us” is not in anyone’s mind at this point (based on observations from past projects). Most of these people are not comfortable with digital technology either, so how do they get access to design trends? When they got a well-designed piece of communication from a company they like, I’m sure they didn’t recognize that it was good design but their perception of the company changed because of it. It’s easy to miss.

In the ideal world I would be allowed to write in a blog from work and about work. That way I could write a branding tutorial specifically for our company listing the components, type styles, logo (which sorely needs an update), colors and graphic elements. Most of the people who create the company publications on their own have Word or Publisher. They would benefit from a library of graphics to use in their publications. All would benefit from advice on layout, structure of content, writing style and production considerations. We (our department) or myself could become a center for advice and learning, giving tips like: If it’s going to be xeroxed onto colored paper, use only black text and desaturated clip art. When mentioning a date, the AP style is Dec. 12, 2007. Our company logo should be used in at least one place in the publication, in color if possible. Our web address should be included in at least two places in the publication. The top administration names should be included on these types of publications: x, and y. Those names should be presented in this way: xy.

We (or I) could provide tutorials and walk-throughs and checklists for things like “How to market an event,” “How to brand a program or department,” “Basic color sense,” “Typography 101,” “How to Make a Document Interesting,” “How to take a Great Picture,” “References for Learning About XYZ.”

In a perfect world.

For now, since anything published by our company has to be on internal servers, I will use personal preferences of one person to impact the publication, the department and the company. There is an art to giving people what they want.

2 Comments »

  1. Great real world post about what happens in lots of companies when it comes to branding.

    One of the reasons I began to pursue the subject of branding was due to my work with graphic artists, web designers and programers.

    Usually over a beer they would share the vague instructions they were given for their projects and how they longed to clarity around branding.

    Like you they got a lot of “I like” and “would be nice” along with “work up 10 or 15 thumbnail sketches and I’ll tell you what I think works.”

    One reason there is no discipline around a unified look and feel resulting in communications clearly sharing the same design/brand language is there there is no clarity around the organizational brand.

    Thanks for sharing your experience and enlarging a very meaningful conversation.

    Keep creating…it freaks people out,
    Mike

    Comment by Mike Wagner — August 29, 2007 @ 9:55 pm | Reply

  2. Thanks for the comment, Mike. You’re right, clarity in the organizational brand is so important in this. And that doesn’t mean slapping the logo on everything. There’s so much more to a brand than most people realize!

    Took a look at your blog – very nice!

    ~liquid

    Comment by liquid06 — September 1, 2007 @ 8:18 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.